From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Odol Corp. v. De Oto

Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia
Dec 5, 1927
23 F.2d 776 (D.C. Cir. 1927)

Opinion

No. 1956.

Submitted November 14, 1927.

Decided December 5, 1927.

Appeal from the Commissioner of Patents.

Interference proceeding between the Odol Corporation and Ottavio De Oto. Decision for the latter, and the former appeals. Affirmed.

Louis Alexander, of New York City, for appellant.

C.A. O'Brien and B.F. Garvey, both of Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.


The Odol Corporation filed an opposition against the registration of "O.D.O." as a trade-mark for liniment to be applied externally. The mark of the opposer is "Odol," used as a trade-mark on a preparation for "the teeth, mouth, and breath."

We agree with the Commissioner of Patents that the goods on which the marks are used are not of the same descriptive properties, and that the marks are not so similar as to lead to confusion in trade.

The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed.


Summaries of

Odol Corp. v. De Oto

Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia
Dec 5, 1927
23 F.2d 776 (D.C. Cir. 1927)
Case details for

Odol Corp. v. De Oto

Case Details

Full title:ODOL CORPORATION v. DE OTO

Court:Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia

Date published: Dec 5, 1927

Citations

23 F.2d 776 (D.C. Cir. 1927)