From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Diah v. New York City

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 25, 2002
02 CIV. 274 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 25, 2002)

Opinion

02 CIV. 274 (DLC)

October 25, 2002


ORDER


By letter of October 8, 2002, defendant Braunstein Chase, L.L.P. contends that it served on plaintiff and filed an Answer on or about April 8, 2002, and on some unspecified date moved to dismiss the complaint. This defendant has provided a copy of the answer but no copy of the notice of motion or motion papers. There is no record in the Court's docket of an answer or motion having been filed. Accordingly, treating the October 8 letter as a request for an extension of the time to answer or otherwise move, it is hereby

ORDERED that Braunstein Chase, L.L.P. shall file its Answer or move by November 8, 2002.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if a motion to dismiss is brought by Braunstein Chase, L.L.P., opposition shall be filed by December 6, 2002, and any reply by December 13, 2002.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that when filing any papers with the Court, the parties shall provide one courtesy copy to Chambers by sending it to this Court's Pro Se Office, Room 230, United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York 10007.


Summaries of

O'Diah v. New York City

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 25, 2002
02 CIV. 274 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 25, 2002)
Case details for

O'Diah v. New York City

Case Details

Full title:AROR ARK O'DIAH, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK CITY, THE PURO WATER GROUP…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 25, 2002

Citations

02 CIV. 274 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 25, 2002)