From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Odewahn v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Oct 14, 1966
407 S.W.2d 137 (Ky. Ct. App. 1966)

Opinion

October 14, 1966.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Criminal Branch, Second Division, Jefferson County, J. Miles Pound, J.

Jacob Carl Odewahn, pro se.

Robert Matthews, Atty. Gen., H.N. McTyeire, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, for appellee.


Jacob Carl Odewahn appeals from a judgment of the Jefferson Circuit Court overruling his RCr 11.42 motion to vacate a judgment sentencing him to life imprisonment. His grounds are that his attorney failed to file a motion for a new trial although he had been requested to do so, and that his attorney failed to perfect an appeal.

This is the second RCr 11.42 motion which this appellant has filed in the Jefferson Circuit Court. (See Odewahn v. Ropke, Ky., 385 S.W.2d 163 (1964). The first motion did not include the grounds that his attorney had failed to file a motion for a new trial or perfect an appeal. Consequently, he is precluded from asserting those grounds on a second motion. Tipton v. Commonwealth, Ky., 398 S.W.2d 493 (1966); Walker v. Wingo, Ky., 398 S.W.2d 885 (1966).

There is no merit to appellant's argument in any event since the judgment of the court shows a motion for a new trial was overruled, and since his motion to vacate does not indicate that he requested his attorney to file an appeal. Benoit v. Commonwealth, Ky., 402 S.W.2d 706 (1966).

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Odewahn v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Oct 14, 1966
407 S.W.2d 137 (Ky. Ct. App. 1966)
Case details for

Odewahn v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:Jacob Carl ODEWAHN, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: Oct 14, 1966

Citations

407 S.W.2d 137 (Ky. Ct. App. 1966)

Citing Cases

Szabo v. Commonwealth

In appellant's behalf it is contended that this court should consider the appeal on its merits because: (1)…

Satterly v. Commonwealth

This is Satterly's second attempt to vacate the conviction. We have held that a prisoner is not entitled to…