From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Dell v. Poshmark, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 18, 2022
22 Civ. 9779 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 18, 2022)

Opinion

22 Civ. 9779 (AT)

11-18-2022

RYAN O'DELL, Plaintiff, v. POSHMARK, INC., MANISH CHANDRA, NAVIN CHADDHA, EBONY BECKWITH, JEFF EPTSTEIN, JENNY MING, HANS TUNG, AND SERENA J. WILLIAMS, Defendants,


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

To protect the public health, while promoting the “just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding,” Fed.R.Civ.P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place “before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28” if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

O'Dell v. Poshmark, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 18, 2022
22 Civ. 9779 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 18, 2022)
Case details for

O'Dell v. Poshmark, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RYAN O'DELL, Plaintiff, v. POSHMARK, INC., MANISH CHANDRA, NAVIN CHADDHA…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 18, 2022

Citations

22 Civ. 9779 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 18, 2022)