From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Dell v. Alleghany Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 9, 2022
22 Civ. 3331 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. May. 9, 2022)

Opinion

22 Civ. 3331 (AT)

05-09-2022

RYAN O'DELL, Plaintiff, v. ALLEGHANY CORPORATION, JEFFERSON W. KIRBY, JOSEPH P. BRANDON, KAREN BRENNER, CHRIS H. CHEESMAN, IAN H. CHIPPENDALE. JOHN G. FOOS, PHILLIP M. MARTINEAU, LAUREN M. TYLER, and RAYMOND L.M. WONG, Defendants.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES, District Judge.

To protect the public health, while promoting the “just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of eveiy action and proceeding, ” Fed.R.Civ.P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place “before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28” if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

O'Dell v. Alleghany Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 9, 2022
22 Civ. 3331 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. May. 9, 2022)
Case details for

O'Dell v. Alleghany Corp.

Case Details

Full title:RYAN O'DELL, Plaintiff, v. ALLEGHANY CORPORATION, JEFFERSON W. KIRBY…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 9, 2022

Citations

22 Civ. 3331 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. May. 9, 2022)