From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC v. Antoine

Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 15, 2023
213 A.D.3d 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

Opinion

2020–03477 Index No. 600238/15

02-15-2023

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, appellant, v. Emmanuel ANTOINE, et al., defendants, Joseph Rafael, LLC, respondent.

Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane & Partners, PLLC, Westbury, NY (Joseph F. Battista of counsel), for appellant. Stim & Warmuth, P.C., Farmingville, NY (Glenn P. Warmuth of counsel), for respondent.


Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane & Partners, PLLC, Westbury, NY (Joseph F. Battista of counsel), for appellant.

Stim & Warmuth, P.C., Farmingville, NY (Glenn P. Warmuth of counsel), for respondent.

BETSY BARROS, J.P., JOSEPH J. MALTESE, DEBORAH A. DOWLING, HELEN VOUTSINAS, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Martha L. Luft, J.), dated March 2, 2020. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the unopposed cross-motion of the defendant Joseph Rafael, LLC, pursuant to CPLR 3215(c) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it as abandoned.

Motion by the respondent to dismiss the appeal on the ground that no appeal lies from an order entered upon the appellant's default. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated April 5, 2021, the motion was held in abeyance and referred to the panel of Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission thereof.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the argument of the appeal, it is

ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed; and it is further,

ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondent.

The plaintiff did not oppose the cross-motion of the defendant Joseph Rafael, LLC, pursuant to CPLR 3215(c) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it as abandoned. As no appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing party (see CPLR 5511 ; Lansky v. Bate, 132 A.D.3d 737, 737, 17 N.Y.S.3d 653 ; Marino v. Termini, 4 A.D.3d 342, 342, 771 N.Y.S.2d 537 ), the appeal must be dismissed.

BARROS, J.P., MALTESE, DOWLING and VOUTSINAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC v. Antoine

Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 15, 2023
213 A.D.3d 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
Case details for

Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC v. Antoine

Case Details

Full title:Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, appellant, v. Emmanuel Antoine, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 15, 2023

Citations

213 A.D.3d 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 876
182 N.Y.S.3d 640

Citing Cases

Depalma v. Zherka

The plaintiff appeals. As no appeal lies from an order granted upon the default of the appealing party, we…

Depalma v. Zherka

As no appeal lies from an order granted upon the default of the appealing party, we must dismiss the appeal…