From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Connor v. Thompson Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 1, 1920
190 App. Div. 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)

Summary

In Thompson v. O'Connor, 115 Ga. 120, 122 (41 S.E. 242) it was observed: "Under certain circumstances, improper remarks of counsel made in the hearing of prospective jurors might render it necessary for the trial judge, in order to assure a fair trial, to discard the panels..."

Summary of this case from Ga. Power Co. v. Redman

Opinion

January, 1920.

Present — Dowling, Laughlin, Smith, Merrell and Philbin, JJ.


Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion.


Summaries of

O'Connor v. Thompson Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 1, 1920
190 App. Div. 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)

In Thompson v. O'Connor, 115 Ga. 120, 122 (41 S.E. 242) it was observed: "Under certain circumstances, improper remarks of counsel made in the hearing of prospective jurors might render it necessary for the trial judge, in order to assure a fair trial, to discard the panels..."

Summary of this case from Ga. Power Co. v. Redman
Case details for

O'Connor v. Thompson Company

Case Details

Full title:BARTHOLOMEW O'CONNOR, an Infant, by NELLIE O'CONNOR, His Guardian ad…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1920

Citations

190 App. Div. 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)

Citing Cases

Ragsdale v. Duren

Some of the principles of law requested did not comport with the pleadings and proof in the case and, had the…

King v. Ellis

" Western Union Tel. Co. v. Owens, 23 Ga. App. 169 (5) ( 98 S.E. 116); Mayor c. of Savannah v. Centennial…