Opinion
Argued April 23, 1886
Decided June 1, 1886
Nathaniel C. Moak for appellant.
Charles J. Patterson for respondent.
DANFORTH, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
O'Connor v. Conzen
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 1, 1886
102 N.Y. 702 (N.Y. 1886)
Summaries of
O'Connor v. Conzen
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 1, 1886
102 N.Y. 702 (N.Y. 1886)
Case details for
O'Connor v. Conzen
Case Details
Full title:MARY O'CONNOR, Respondent, v . LAWRENCE CONZEN, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 1, 1886
Citations
102 N.Y. 702 (N.Y. 1886)
2 N.Y. St. Rptr. 417