From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Connor v. Carnahan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
Jun 15, 2012
3:09cv224-WS (N.D. Fla. Jun. 15, 2012)

Opinion

3:09cv224-WS

06-15-2012

NYKA O'CONNOR, Plaintiff, v. M.L. CARNAHAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 95) docketed March 27, 2012. The plaintiff has filed no objections to the report and recommendation.

The court has reviewed the record and has determined that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 95) is hereby ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The plaintiff's claims for deprivation of property, denial of due process, harassing cell searches, retaliatory DR, heightened security status, use of excessive force, and access-to-courts are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

3. The plaintiff's deliberate indifference claim (as set forth in Document #93 at ¶ 21), asserting that he attacked another prisoner because he was not housed alone for ninety days following his release from the TCU, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The plaintiff's deliberate indifference claim (as set forth in Document #93 at ¶ 22), asserting that he was denied psychiatric medications, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

4. The plaintiff's free speech claims under the First Amendment (as set forth in Document #93 at ¶¶ 3 & 10), asserting that a document attached to a grievance was improperly opened and retained and that spiral bindings were not removed from his TAB materials, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

5. The plaintiff's free speech claims concerning the processing of his mail (as set forth in Document #93 at ¶¶ 1, 2, 11-14, and 23-25) are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

6. The plaintiff shall have until July 20, 2012, to file a fifth amended complaint to assert only his free speech claims concerning the processing of his mail and any supplemental state law claims.

7. If the plaintiff fails to file a fifth amended complaint on or before July 20, 2012, the clerk shall enter a judgment of dismiss without further order of the court.

___________

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

O'Connor v. Carnahan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
Jun 15, 2012
3:09cv224-WS (N.D. Fla. Jun. 15, 2012)
Case details for

O'Connor v. Carnahan

Case Details

Full title:NYKA O'CONNOR, Plaintiff, v. M.L. CARNAHAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION

Date published: Jun 15, 2012

Citations

3:09cv224-WS (N.D. Fla. Jun. 15, 2012)

Citing Cases

Chambers v. Santiago

Because the property restriction did not deprive Plaintiff of a liberty interest, he was not entitled to any…

Bey v. Jaeger

Nor was 25 days of a “back of cell” restriction significant enough to create a liberty interest. See Hashim…