From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Connor v. 1751 Broadway, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 15, 1956
139 N.E.2d 152 (N.Y. 1956)

Summary

In O'Connor v. 1751 Broadway, Inc., 2 N.Y.2d 769, 157 N.Y.S.2d 975, 139 N.E.2d 152, the plaintiff found himself locked in a room in the defendant's building because of a defective lock. He tried to get out through the transom in circumstances that involved risk, and while doing so fell and was injured.

Summary of this case from Richards v. New York, New Haven Hartford R

Opinion

Argued October 8, 1956

Decided November 15, 1956

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, M. HENRY MARTUSCELLO, J.

Julian Buchbinder and Mary Johnson Lowe for appellant.

William C. Mattison and Thomas P. Curtin for respondent.


Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ.


Summaries of

O'Connor v. 1751 Broadway, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 15, 1956
139 N.E.2d 152 (N.Y. 1956)

In O'Connor v. 1751 Broadway, Inc., 2 N.Y.2d 769, 157 N.Y.S.2d 975, 139 N.E.2d 152, the plaintiff found himself locked in a room in the defendant's building because of a defective lock. He tried to get out through the transom in circumstances that involved risk, and while doing so fell and was injured.

Summary of this case from Richards v. New York, New Haven Hartford R
Case details for

O'Connor v. 1751 Broadway, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HARRY O'CONNOR, Appellant, v. 1751 BROADWAY, INC., Respondent, et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 15, 1956

Citations

139 N.E.2d 152 (N.Y. 1956)
139 N.E.2d 152
157 N.Y.S.2d 975

Citing Cases

Tannenbaum v. Bd. of Educ., Cent. High School

We find that, in the absence of any prior notice of similar occurrences, the defendants could not reasonably…

Richards v. New York, New Haven Hartford R

In these conditions the court held that a nonsuit was improper, but there is not the least reason to suppose…