From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Connell v. U.S. Small Business Administration

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 9, 2006
No. CIV S-06-0048 LKK KJM PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-0048 LKK KJM PS.

August 9, 2006


ORDER


Defendants' motion to dismiss and/or for summary judgment came on regularly for hearing August 9, 2006. Plaintiff appeared in propria persona. Erika Covarrubias appeared for defendants. At the hearing, plaintiff orally made a motion to dismiss the action without prejudice. Upon discussion with plaintiff and counsel and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

1. Within two weeks from the date of this order, defendants shall file any opposition, limited to five pages, to plaintiff's motion to dismiss without prejudice. Reply, if any, also limited to five pages, shall be filed within one week thereafter. In the alternative, the parties may file a stipulated dismissal.

2. No later than August 11, 2006, plaintiff may file a concise letter brief containing citations relevant to the statute of limitations issue. Any reply by defendants on this issue may be filed by letter brief no later than August 18, 2006. Defendants' motion to dismiss and/or for summary judgment shall thereafter stand submitted.


Summaries of

O'Connell v. U.S. Small Business Administration

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 9, 2006
No. CIV S-06-0048 LKK KJM PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2006)
Case details for

O'Connell v. U.S. Small Business Administration

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN O'CONNELL, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 9, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-06-0048 LKK KJM PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2006)