From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Connell v. Dir. of Elections

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Mar 30, 2016
SC: 153414 (Mich. Mar. 30, 2016)

Opinion

SC: 153414

03-30-2016

PETER D. O'CONNELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF ELECTIONS, BUREAU OF ELECTIONS, and MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Defendants-Appellees


Order

153414 & (4) Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, Justices COA: 332132
Ct of Claims: 16-000038-MB

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court before consideration by the Court of Appeals.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 30, 2016

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

O'Connell v. Dir. of Elections

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Mar 30, 2016
SC: 153414 (Mich. Mar. 30, 2016)
Case details for

O'Connell v. Dir. of Elections

Case Details

Full title:PETER D. O'CONNELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF ELECTIONS, BUREAU…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Mar 30, 2016

Citations

SC: 153414 (Mich. Mar. 30, 2016)