From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oconefsky v. Streisand

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 22, 1996
229 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

July 22, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In support of his motion for summary judgment, the defendant submitted excerpts from his own deposition testimony, as well as an affidavit of a witness, Arnold Gruber. Both the deposition testimony and the affidavit clearly established that the defendant terminated the plaintiff's interest in the trust at issue in accordance with the terms of the trust agreement and its subsequent amendment. The plaintiff did not submit any admissible evidence to contradict the defendant's showing. Accordingly, the court properly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint ( see, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557).

We have considered the plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J.P., Copertino, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Oconefsky v. Streisand

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 22, 1996
229 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Oconefsky v. Streisand

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD OCONEFSKY, Appellant, v. SHELDON J. STREISAND, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 22, 1996

Citations

229 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
644 N.Y.S.2d 1008