From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ochoa v. Junious

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 12, 2011
1:11-cv-01021-DLB (HC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2011)

Opinion

1:11-cv-01021-DLB (HC)

10-12-2011

JOSE ROLANDO OCHOA, Petitioner, v. MAURICE JUNIOUS, Respondent.


ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE

A RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT'S REPLY

WITHIN TWENTY DAYS FROM THE DATE

OF SERVICE OF THIS ORDER


[Doc. 21]

Petitioner is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1), the parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge. Local Rule 305(b).

Now pending before the Court is Respondent's motion to dismiss filed on August 4, 2011. Petitioner filed an opposition on August 18, 2011, and at the Court's request, Respondent filed a reply on September 29, 2011. Petitioner is hereby directed to file a response to Respondent's reply within twenty (20) days from the date of service of this order. After the twenty day period has expired, the motion will be deemed submitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dennis L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Ochoa v. Junious

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 12, 2011
1:11-cv-01021-DLB (HC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2011)
Case details for

Ochoa v. Junious

Case Details

Full title:JOSE ROLANDO OCHOA, Petitioner, v. MAURICE JUNIOUS, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 12, 2011

Citations

1:11-cv-01021-DLB (HC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2011)