From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ochoa v. Baker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jul 23, 2014
3:13-cv-00449-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Jul. 23, 2014)

Opinion

3:13-cv-00449-RCJ-WGC

07-23-2014

ARTURO TORRES OCHOA, Plaintiff, v. RENEE BAKER et al., Defendants.


ORDER

The Court dismissed this prisoner civil rights action and ordered the case closed on September 16, 2013. (Order, ECF No. 3). Specifically, the Court noted that "plaintiff has filed numerous meritless, frivolous and/or delusional actions in this district," (id. at 1), denied the application to proceed in forma pauperis, (id. at 2), and dismissed the action "without prejudic to the filing of a new complaint on the required form in a new action together with either a ne pauper application with all required, and new, attachments or payment of the $350.00 filing fee," (id. (emphasis added)). Pursuant to the Court's order, the Clerk of the Court entered final judgment accordingly. (Judgment, ECF No. 4). Plaintiff has now filed a handwritten, partially illegible "Application Seeking to File Injunction." (ECF No. 5). Plaintiff has not filed a new complaint, used the required forms, docketed a new pauper application, or paid the $350.00 filing fee. Therefore, based on the Court's prior order, the pending "application" is denied.

CONCLUSION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the pending motion (ECF No. 5) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

ROBERT C. JONES

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Ochoa v. Baker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jul 23, 2014
3:13-cv-00449-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Jul. 23, 2014)
Case details for

Ochoa v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:ARTURO TORRES OCHOA, Plaintiff, v. RENEE BAKER et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jul 23, 2014

Citations

3:13-cv-00449-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Jul. 23, 2014)