From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ocegueda v. CCS Commercial, LLC

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 29, 2024
5:24-cv-00351-SSS-DTBx (C.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2024)

Opinion

5:24-cv-00351-SSS-DTBx

04-29-2024

Geneva Ocegueda v. CCS Commercial, LLC


PRESENT: THE HONORABLE SUNSHINE S. SYKES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES- GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed Against Plaintiff and Defendant's Counsel for Failure to File a Rule 26(f) Report

On March 21, 2024, the Court issued an order setting the Scheduling Conference for May 10, 2024. [Dkt. 12]. Pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties are to file their Joint Rule 26(f) Report not later than 14 days before the Scheduling Conference. As of today's date, the parties have not filed a Joint Rule 26(f) Report.

Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff, Geneva Ocegueda, and counsel for Defendant, Michael J. Wright and Philip Hsing-Tsung Lo, to show cause why they should not each be sanctioned in the amount of $250 for their failure to file a timely Joint Rule 26(f) Report. The parties are DIRECTED to respond in writing to this Order to Show Cause by Monday, May 6, 2024, at 12:00 noon. The parties' failure to respond-or the parties' filing of an inadequate response-may result in the imposition of additional sanctions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ocegueda v. CCS Commercial, LLC

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 29, 2024
5:24-cv-00351-SSS-DTBx (C.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2024)
Case details for

Ocegueda v. CCS Commercial, LLC

Case Details

Full title:Geneva Ocegueda v. CCS Commercial, LLC

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Apr 29, 2024

Citations

5:24-cv-00351-SSS-DTBx (C.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2024)