Opinion
September 17, 2004.
Appeal from an order of the District Court of Nassau County (Randy Sue Marber, J.), entered July 16, 2003. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.
Amos Weinberg, Great Neck, for appellant.
Bruno Gerbino Macchia LLP, Melville, and Rivkin Radler LLP, Uniondale ( Evan H. Krinick and Stuart M. Bodoff of counsel), for respondent.
Present: McCABE, P.J., RUDOLPH and ANGIOLILLO, JJ.
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order insofar as appealed from unanimously affirmed with $10 costs.
Plaintiff, a health care provider, seeking to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, established a prima facie entitlement to summary judgment by the submission of a complete proof of claim and the amount of the loss ( see Insurance Law § 5106 [a]; Mary Immaculate Hosp. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 5 AD3d 742; Amaze Med. Supply v. Eagle Ins. Co., 2 Misc 3d 128[A], 2003 NY Slip Op 51701[U] [App Term, 2d 11th Jud Dists 2003]). Defendant failed to deny the claim within the statutory 30-day claim determination period (11 NYCRR 65.15 [g] [3]). Defendant's requests for examinations under oath did not toll the 30-day period, inasmuch as the insurance regulation in effect at the time plaintiff submitted its claim did not contain a provision requiring a claimant to appear for an examination under oath ( see A.B. Med. Servs. PLLC v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 2003 NY Slip Op 51392[U] [App Term, 2d 11th Jud Dists 2003]). Accordingly, defendant is precluded from raising most defenses ( see Presbyterian Hosp. in City of N.Y. v. Maryland Cas. Co., 90 NY2d 274, 282).
However, an untimely denial does not preclude a defendant from asserting the defense that the collision was a staged event in furtherance of an insurance fraud scheme ( see Matter of Metro Med. Diagnostics v. Eagle Ins. Co., 293 AD2d 751). The investigator's affidavit set forth sufficient facts to demonstrate that defendant possessed a "founded belief that the alleged injur[ies] do not arise out of an insured incident" ( Central Gen. Hosp. v. Chubb Group of Ins. Cos., 90 NY2d 195, 199). As a result, because defendant demonstrated the existence of a triable issue of fact as to whether there was a lack of coverage ( see id.), plaintiff's motion for summary judgment was properly denied.