From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ocean Hill v. Currituck

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 9, 2007
361 N.C. 228 (N.C. 2007)

Opinion

No. 382PA06.

March 9, 2007.

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 178 N.C. App. 182, 630 S.E.2d 714 (2006), finding no error in a judgment entered on 10 March 2005 and an order dated 1 April 2005, both entered by Judge J. Richard Parker in Superior Court, Currituck County. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 February 2007.

C. Everett Thompson, II, for petitioner-appellees. Katherine F. McKenzie for respondent-appellant Currituck County Board of Commissioners; and Robinson, Bradshaw Hinson, P.A., by John R. Wester and Jonathan C. Krisko, and Trimpi Nash, LLP, by Thomas P. Nash, IV, for respondent-appellant Ocean Hill I Property Owners Association, Inc. Andrew L. Romanet, Jr., General Counsel, and Gregory F. Schwitzgebel, III, Senior Assistant General Counsel, North Carolina League of Municipalities, amicus curiae. Robert E. Hagemann, Senior Assistant City Attorney, and Ashley R. Heaton, Assistant City Attorney, City of Charlotte, amicus curiae. Ellis Winters LLP, by Matthew W. Sawchak and Julia F. Youngman, for North Carolina Association of County Commissioners, amicus curiae.


DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.


Summaries of

Ocean Hill v. Currituck

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 9, 2007
361 N.C. 228 (N.C. 2007)
Case details for

Ocean Hill v. Currituck

Case Details

Full title:OCEAN HILL JOINT VENTURE; OCEAN HILL PROPERTIES, INC.; THE VILLAGES AT…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 9, 2007

Citations

361 N.C. 228 (N.C. 2007)

Citing Cases

In re Clouse

“[A] de novo hearing or trial conducted pursuant to a specific statutory mandate requires judge or jury to…