From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Occhipinti v. Occhipinti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jan 23, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 62534 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

DOCKET NO. CA 16-01756

01-23-2017

TAMMY M. OCCHIPINTI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH M. OCCHIPINTI, III, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


PRESENT:

An appeal having been taken herein from a judgment of the Supreme Court entered in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Oneida on January 4, 2016, and an application having been made by Michele E. DeTraglia, Esq., for substitution of counsel as attorney for the child,

Now, upon reading and filing the statement of Michele E. DeTraglia, Esq., dated November 28, 2016,

It is hereby ORDERED that the application is granted, and

It is further ORDERED that Lucille M. Rignanese, Esq., 1200 Floyd Avenue, Rome, New York 13440, is hereby assigned as attorney for the child.

Entered: January 23, 2017

FRANCES E. CAFARELL, Clerk


Summaries of

Occhipinti v. Occhipinti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jan 23, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 62534 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Occhipinti v. Occhipinti

Case Details

Full title:TAMMY M. OCCHIPINTI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH M. OCCHIPINTI, III…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 23, 2017

Citations

2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 62534 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)