From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Occhionero v. Fresno

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 1, 2006
Case No. 1:05-cv-01184-AWI-SMS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 1:05-cv-01184-AWI-SMS.

February 1, 2006

Charles L. Doerksen, Fresno, California, Attorney for plaintiff.

GREG OCCHIONERO, BETTS WRIGHT, Joseph D. Rubin, CITY OF FRESNO, Attorneys for defendant.


STIPULATION CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER


WHEREAS, this action is not currently at issue;

WHEREAS, defendant CITY OF FRESNO ("defendant") has filed a Rule 12 motion as to plaintiff GREG OCCHIONERO's ("plaintiff") second amended complaint, the hearing on which is scheduled for February 27, 2006; and

WHEREAS, in light of the foregoing, the parties believe that it would be appropriate to continue the Scheduling Conference set for February 7, 2006,

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties hereto, through their respective counsel, that the Scheduling Conference, currently set for February 7, 2006, at 9:15 a.m. in Stipulation Continuing Scheduling Conference; Order 1 Courtroom 7 of the above-captioned court, is continued to APRIL 18, 2006, at 9:15 a.m. in Courtroom 7 before Judge Snyder.

IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Occhionero v. Fresno

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 1, 2006
Case No. 1:05-cv-01184-AWI-SMS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2006)
Case details for

Occhionero v. Fresno

Case Details

Full title:GREG OCCHIONERO, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF FRESNO, and DOES 1 through 40…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 1, 2006

Citations

Case No. 1:05-cv-01184-AWI-SMS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2006)