From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Occhifinto v. Olivo Constr. Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mar 20, 2014
88 A.3d 187 (N.J. 2014)

Opinion

2014-03-20

Robert OCCHIFINTO and NVE, Inc., Plaintiff–Petitioner, v. OLIVO CONSTRUCTION CO., LLC, Martin Olivo, Houghton, Quarty & Warr, LLC, WW Construction And Masonry, Star Building Systems, Andres F. Andersen Associates, Inc., Diamond Sand and Gravel Co., Inc., Antul N. Shah, P.E., ANS Consultants, Inc., Bardo, Cox & Miller, Inc., Defendants, and Robert S. Keppler Mason Contractors, LLC, a/k/a Robert S. Keppler Concrete Construction, LLC, and Mercer Mutual Insurance. Co., Defendants–Respondents.


It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted limited to the issue of whether plaintiffs were entitled to attorney's fees as successful claimants pursuant to Rule 4:42–9(a)(6).


Summaries of

Occhifinto v. Olivo Constr. Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mar 20, 2014
88 A.3d 187 (N.J. 2014)
Case details for

Occhifinto v. Olivo Constr. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Robert OCCHIFINTO and NVE, Inc., Plaintiff–Petitioner, v. OLIVO…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Mar 20, 2014

Citations

88 A.3d 187 (N.J. 2014)
217 N.J. 291

Citing Cases

Occhifinto v. Olivo Constr. Co.

We granted certification limited to the issue of Occhifinto's right to counsel fees under Rule 4:42–9(a)(6).…