From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Brien v. Triborough Bridge Tunnel Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 5, 2005
17 A.D.3d 105 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

5786.

April 5, 2005.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Janice L. Bowman, J.), entered April 21, 2004, which denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant the motion insofar as to dismiss plaintiff's Labor Law § 240 (1), § 200 and common-law negligence claims, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Ellenberg Rigby, LLP, New York (John R. Wiess of counsel), for appellant.

Robert S. Mazzuchin, Brooklyn, for respondent.

Before: Buckley, P.J., Tom, Andrias, Friedman and Sullivan, JJ.


Inasmuch as the record shows that plaintiff sustained the complained-of injury when his wrist became stuck against an iron beam, i.e., in an accident in which elevation differentials played no significant role, and not as a result of his subsequent fall from his work position onto safety netting, summary judgment dismissing his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim should have been granted ( see Narducci v. Manhasset Bay Assoc., 96 NY2d 259, 269). Summary judgment should have been granted as well dismissing plaintiff's Labor Law § 200 and common-law negligence claims since the record is devoid of evidence that defendant exercised any direct control over the injury-producing work ( see Rizzuto v. L.A. Wenger Contr. Co., 91 NY2d 343, 352).

The motion court, however, properly found triable issues as to whether defendant permitted the wooden block upon which plaintiff was working to become slippery in violation of 12 NYCRR 23-1.7 (d) with resultant injury to plaintiff, thus precluding dismissal of the Labor Law § 241 (6) claim.


Summaries of

O'Brien v. Triborough Bridge Tunnel Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 5, 2005
17 A.D.3d 105 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

O'Brien v. Triborough Bridge Tunnel Auth

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL O'BRIEN, Respondent, v. TRIBOROUGH BRIDGE AND TUNNEL AUTHORITY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 5, 2005

Citations

17 A.D.3d 105 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
793 N.Y.S.2d 24

Citing Cases

Gasques v. State

Rather, they are limited to such specific gravity-related accidents as falling from a height or being struck…

Velasquez v. Biltmore Constr. Corp.

(emphases added) This regulatory provision's specific mandate furnishes a basis for plaintiff's claim under…