From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Brien v. O'Brien

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 14, 1929
147 A. 911 (N.J. 1929)

Opinion

Decided October 14th, 1929.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery.

Messrs. Wall, Haight, Carey Hartpence, for the appellant.

Mr. L. Edward Herrman, for the respondent.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fallon, and reported in 103 N.J. Eq. 214. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

O'Brien v. O'Brien

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 14, 1929
147 A. 911 (N.J. 1929)
Case details for

O'Brien v. O'Brien

Case Details

Full title:LAURETTA V. O'BRIEN, appellant, v. THOMAS M. O'BRIEN, respondent

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 14, 1929

Citations

147 A. 911 (N.J. 1929)
147 A. 911

Citing Cases

Zieper v. Zieper

True, the law does not in all cases impose that obligation upon the husband, particularly where the wife has…

Venere v. Venere

In this the Advisory Master erred. To support a finding of abandonment or separation by the husband as…