From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Brien v. Hancock

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
Jun 26, 2012
Civil Action No. 7:10-CV-30 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Jun. 26, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 7:10-CV-30 (HL)

06-26-2012

LARRY THOMAS O'BRIEN, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL HANCOCK, Defendant.


ORDER

This case is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration and Violation of Local Rule 83.3 (Doc. 72). Plaintiff has provided no valid reason for the Court to reconsider any of its previous orders. Further, the motion is untimely, as motions for reconsideration must be filed with the Clerk of Court within 14 days after entry of the order or judgment. The last order and judgment in this case was entered on May 29, 2012, and Plaintiff's motion was filed on June 19, 2012, which makes it untimely. The motion is denied.

________________________

HUGH LAWSON , SENIOR JUDGE
mbh


Summaries of

O'Brien v. Hancock

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
Jun 26, 2012
Civil Action No. 7:10-CV-30 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Jun. 26, 2012)
Case details for

O'Brien v. Hancock

Case Details

Full title:LARRY THOMAS O'BRIEN, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL HANCOCK, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION

Date published: Jun 26, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 7:10-CV-30 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Jun. 26, 2012)