From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Brien v. Hancock

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
May 29, 2012
Civil Action No. 7:10-CV-30 (HL) (M.D. Ga. May. 29, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 7:10-CV-30 (HL)

05-29-2012

LARRY THOMAS O'BRIEN, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL HANCOCK, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff (Doc. 62), entered on April 17, 2012, in which he recommends that Defendants: Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 38) be granted.

Plaintiff has filed what the Court broadly construes as an objection to the Recommendation. The Court has made a de novo review of the Recommendation, and after careful consideration, accepts and adopts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 38) is granted. Plaintiff's objection is overruled.

Plaintiff's Motion to Impute Disqualification (Doc. 66) is denied as moot.

mbh

_________________

HUGH LAWSON , SENIOR JUDGE


Summaries of

O'Brien v. Hancock

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
May 29, 2012
Civil Action No. 7:10-CV-30 (HL) (M.D. Ga. May. 29, 2012)
Case details for

O'Brien v. Hancock

Case Details

Full title:LARRY THOMAS O'BRIEN, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL HANCOCK, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION

Date published: May 29, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 7:10-CV-30 (HL) (M.D. Ga. May. 29, 2012)