From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oblio Telecom, Inc. v. Patel

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Jan 8, 2010
Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-0279-L (N.D. Tex. Jan. 8, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-0279-L.

January 8, 2010


ORDER


Before the court are the Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, filed December 22, 2009. No objections were filed.

Defendants Hawaii Global Exchange, Inc., Transpac Telecom, Inc., and Zubar Patel filed motions for attorney's fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927 and the court's inherent powers. The magistrate judge recommends denying their motions.

The court has reviewed the magistrate judge's report, the record, and the applicable law, and determines that the findings are correct and are therefore accepted as those of the court. The court therefore denies Motion for an Award of Attorney's Fees or Alternatively for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause (doc. 73), filed October 16, 2009, and denies Defendant Zuber Patel's Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees (doc. 74), filed October 22, 2009.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Oblio Telecom, Inc. v. Patel

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Jan 8, 2010
Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-0279-L (N.D. Tex. Jan. 8, 2010)
Case details for

Oblio Telecom, Inc. v. Patel

Case Details

Full title:OBLIO TELECOM, INC., Plaintiff, v. ZUBER PATEL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: Jan 8, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-0279-L (N.D. Tex. Jan. 8, 2010)

Citing Cases

MetroPCS v. Thomas

This is insufficient to show bad faith. See Oblio Telecom, Inc. v. Patel, No. 3:08-CV-0279-L, 2010 WL…

Hill v. The Estate of Hill

See Procter & Gamble Co. v. Amway Corp., 280 F.3d 519, 525 (5th Cir. 2002). Before awarding sanctions under…