From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Obama-Carter v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Apr 25, 2011
Civil Action No. 11 0783 (D.D.C. Apr. 25, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11 0783.

April 25, 2011


MEMORANDUM OPINION


This matter is before the Court on its initial review of the plaintiff's pro se complaint and application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the Court is required to dismiss a complaint upon a determination that it, among other grounds, is frivolous. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).

The plaintiff sues a host of political figures and celebrities. See Complaint ("Compl.") Caption. Her accusations of rape, blackmail and extortion allegedly after she married President Barack Obama, see Compl. at 1, and allegations that, inter alia, Oprah Winfrey willed her "3/4 of her estate but commited [sic] crimes on me and the State of New Jersey . . . made her give me her entire estate. . . ., id. at 2, and Donald Trump "did not allow [her], Audrey Carter and President Obama to live together. . . .," id., are the type of fantastic or delusional scenarios warranting dismissal under § 1915(e)(2) as frivolous. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989); accord Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330-31 (D.C. Cir. 1994).

A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

Date: April 20, 2011


Summaries of

Obama-Carter v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Apr 25, 2011
Civil Action No. 11 0783 (D.D.C. Apr. 25, 2011)
Case details for

Obama-Carter v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:Audrey Obama-Carter, Plaintiff, v. United States, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Apr 25, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11 0783 (D.D.C. Apr. 25, 2011)