From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oba v. Larsen

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 3, 2021
1:21-cv-00487-DAD-EPG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-00487-DAD-EPG

08-03-2021

NANCY M. OBA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. STEVE LARSEN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE IN LIGHT OF PLAINTIFF'S VOLUNTARY NOTICE OF DISMISSAL (ECF NO. 23)

On August 2, 2021, Plaintiffs filed a notice of voluntary dismissal (ECF No. 23), without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), as Defendants have not filed an answer or motion for summary judgment. Although Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Bank of America, N.A., have filed motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 9, 10), which remain pending, Plaintiffs still have the right to dismiss this case:

Under Rule 41(a)(1), a plaintiff has an absolute right voluntarily to dismiss his action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Even if the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by filing a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1).
Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (internal citation omitted).

Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to vacate all pending deadlines and to close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Oba v. Larsen

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 3, 2021
1:21-cv-00487-DAD-EPG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2021)
Case details for

Oba v. Larsen

Case Details

Full title:NANCY M. OBA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. STEVE LARSEN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 3, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-00487-DAD-EPG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2021)