From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oatey v. Paramo

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Apr 2, 2015
CV 14-1923 DDP (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2015)

Opinion

          Christopher L. Oatey, Petitioner, Pro se, Soledad, CA.

          For Daniel Paramo, Warden, Respondent: Chung L Mar, CAAG - Office of Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA.


          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          DEAN D. PREGERSON, United States District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written Objections to the Report. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgement be entered denying the Petition without prejudice.

         JUDGMENT

         Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is dismissed without prejudice.


Summaries of

Oatey v. Paramo

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Apr 2, 2015
CV 14-1923 DDP (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2015)
Case details for

Oatey v. Paramo

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER L. OATEY, Petitioner, v. DANIEL PARAMO, WARDEN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Apr 2, 2015

Citations

CV 14-1923 DDP (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2015)