Opinion
362591
02-06-2023
LC No. 20-004385-CB
Kirsten Frank Kelly Presiding Judge Thomas C. Cameron Anica Letica Judges
ORDER
The motion to file a late answer is GRANTED and the answer filed on September 19, 2022, is accepted.
The application for leave to appeal is DENIED for failure to persuade the Court of the need for immediate appellate review.
The motion to seal is GRANTED. This Court finds good cause to seal the Court of Appeals file based on the parties' joint interest in the confidentiality of the proprietary information at issue, as recogized in the stipulated protective order entered in the trial court, and determines there are no less restrictive means to adequately and effectively protect the interests asserted. MCR 7.211(C)(9)(e).
The Clerk shall disclose or provide copies of any order entered in this appeal, MCR 8.119(I)(5); MCR 7.211(C)(9)(c), but sealed pleadings or other contents of the file shall not be disclosed or made available for public viewing.
The Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this order to the Clerk of the Supreme Court and to the State Court Administrative Office. MCR 8.119(I)(7); MCR 7.211(C)(9)(c).