From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oakley v. Summerfield

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Mar 29, 1956
231 F.2d 775 (D.C. Cir. 1956)

Summary

In Oakley v. Summerfield, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 22, 231 F.2d 775, there were involved admittedly innocuous books and publications in addition to the photographs found by the Post Office Department to be obscene.

Summary of this case from Klaw v. Schaffer

Opinion

Nos. 12918, 12971, 13023.

Argued January 31, 1956.

Decided March 29, 1956.

Mr. Josiah Lyman, Washington, D.C., for appellants in Nos. 12,918 and 13,023, and appellees in No. 12,971.

Mr. William F. Becker, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U.S. Atty., and Lewis Carroll, Asst. U.S. Atty., were on the brief, for appellees in Nos. 12,918 and 13,023 and appellants in No. 12,971.

Mr. Oliver Gasch, Principal Asst. U.S. Atty., also entered an appearance for appellants in No. 12,971.

Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and WASHINGTON and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges.


This litigation is similar to the Tourlanes cases (Tourlanes Publishing Co. v. Summerfield), 97 U.S.App.D.C. ___, 231 F.2d 773. Oakley is a photographer and not a publisher. However, he sells numerous admittedly innocuous books and publications, in addition to the photographs found by the Post Office Department to be obscene. The judgment of the District Court, which was similar to its order in Tourlanes, will likewise be affirmed (No. 12,971). During oral argument, counsel for Oakley made the same statement concerning his cross-appeal as was made by counsel for Tourlanes. On a like basis, the appeals by Oakley will be dismissed (Nos. 12,918 and 13,023).

So ordered.


Summaries of

Oakley v. Summerfield

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Mar 29, 1956
231 F.2d 775 (D.C. Cir. 1956)

In Oakley v. Summerfield, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 22, 231 F.2d 775, there were involved admittedly innocuous books and publications in addition to the photographs found by the Post Office Department to be obscene.

Summary of this case from Klaw v. Schaffer
Case details for

Oakley v. Summerfield

Case Details

Full title:Roy A. OAKLEY et al., Appellants, v. Arthur E. SUMMERFIELD, Postmaster…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Mar 29, 1956

Citations

231 F.2d 775 (D.C. Cir. 1956)
98 U.S. App. D.C. 22

Citing Cases

Klaw v. Schaffer

In Tourlanes Publishing Company v. Summerfield, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 20, 231 F.2d 773, certiorari denied 352 U.S.…

Glanzman v. Finkle

It is my belief, therefore, that the order in question is too broad, and exceeds the power conferred upon the…