From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oakie v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Oct 11, 2017
No. 71948 (Nev. App. Oct. 11, 2017)

Opinion

No. 71948

10-11-2017

NATHAN CLARENCE OAKIE, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Nathan Clarence Oakie appeals from a judgment of conviction entered pursuant to a guilty plea of robbery. First Judicial District Court, Carson City; James Todd Russell, Judge.

Oakie claims the district court abused its discretion by imposing the sentence in this case to run consecutively to the sentence imposed in a different case. Oakie claims the district court failed to consider the psychological examination report provided by Oakie and the recommendations it contained.

It is within the district court's discretion to impose consecutive sentences. See NRS 176.035(1); Pitmon v. State, 131 Nev. ___, ___, 352 P.3d 655, 659 (Ct. App. 2015); see generally Houk v. State, 103 Nev. 659, 664, 747 P.2d 1376, 1379 (1987) ("The sentencing judge has wide discretion in imposing a sentence . . . ."). This court will refrain from interfering with the sentence imposed "[s]o long as the record does not demonstrate prejudice resulting from consideration of information or accusations founded on facts supported only by impalpable or highly suspect evidence." Silks v. State, 92 Nev. 91, 94, 545 P.2d 1159, 1161 (1976).

The sentence imposed in this case, 60 to 180 months in prison, is within the parameters provided by the relevant statute, see NRS 200.380(2), and Oakie failed to allege the district court relied on facts supported only by impalpable or highly suspect evidence. The district court considered the psychological examination report provided by Oakie, but determined Oakie should be given a consecutive sentence because this case was wholly separate from the other case and Oakie endangered the life of a police officer. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing consecutive sentences, and we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Silver

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge

State Public Defender/Carson City

Attorney General/Carson City

Carson City District Attorney

Carson City Clerk


Summaries of

Oakie v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Oct 11, 2017
No. 71948 (Nev. App. Oct. 11, 2017)
Case details for

Oakie v. State

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN CLARENCE OAKIE, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 11, 2017

Citations

No. 71948 (Nev. App. Oct. 11, 2017)