From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oakhill Associates v. D'Amato

Supreme Court of Connecticut
May 4, 1993
225 Conn. 926 (Conn. 1993)

Opinion

(14768)

Decided May 4, 1993


The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 356 (AC 11098), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the trial court could misallocate the burden of proof regarding liability and still conclude that the plaintiff was not damaged?"


Richard P. Weinstein, in support of the petition.

Richard C. Robinson, in opposition.


Summaries of

Oakhill Associates v. D'Amato

Supreme Court of Connecticut
May 4, 1993
225 Conn. 926 (Conn. 1993)
Case details for

Oakhill Associates v. D'Amato

Case Details

Full title:OAKHILL ASSOCIATES v. EDWARD A. D'AMATO, SR., ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: May 4, 1993

Citations

225 Conn. 926 (Conn. 1993)
625 A.2d 826

Citing Cases

Oakhill Associates v. D'Amato

Certification was limited to the following issue: "Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the…

Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Juchniewich

(Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Dunham v. Dunham, supra, 204 Conn. at 322-23, 528 A.2d…