From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oakes v. Saginaw County Circuit Court

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jul 29, 2021
(5) (Mich. Jul. 29, 2021)

Opinion

SC 162958 (4) (5) (6) (12) (13) (15) (17) (18)

07-29-2021

STACY L. ERWIN OAKES, Plaintiff, v. SAGINAW COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT and SAGINAW COUNTY CLERK, Defendants.


Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh Elizabeth M. Welch, Justices

ORDER

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

On order of the Court, the motion to supplement brief is GRANTED. The motions for immediate consideration are GRANTED. The complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief. On its own motion, the Court has determined that the plaintiff has "habitually, persistently, and without reasonable cause engage[d] in vexatious conduct," MCR 7.316(C)(3), so the plaintiff is prohibited from filing actions in this Court without the filing fee. The ex parte motion for consideration of complaint, the motion requesting issuance of TRO, the motion to withdraw pleadings, and the motion for courtroom assignment are DENIED.


Summaries of

Oakes v. Saginaw County Circuit Court

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jul 29, 2021
(5) (Mich. Jul. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Oakes v. Saginaw County Circuit Court

Case Details

Full title:STACY L. ERWIN OAKES, Plaintiff, v. SAGINAW COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT and…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Jul 29, 2021

Citations

(5) (Mich. Jul. 29, 2021)