From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaur v. Am. Transit Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of New York.
May 1, 2012
968 N.E.2d 994 (N.Y. 2012)

Summary

decreeing that triable issues of fact existed concerning the defendant's successor liability

Summary of this case from Lippens v. Winkler Int'l Corp.

Opinion

2012-05-1

Sarbjeet KAUR, etc., Respondent, v. AMERICAN TRANSIT INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants, Baker, McEvoy, Morrisey & Moskovits, P.C., Appellant.

Steinberg & Cavaliere, LLP, White Plains (Ronald W. Weiner of counsel), for appellant. Sivin & Miller, L.L.P., New York City (Edward Sivin of counsel), for respondent.


Steinberg & Cavaliere, LLP, White Plains (Ronald W. Weiner of counsel), for appellant. Sivin & Miller, L.L.P., New York City (Edward Sivin of counsel), for respondent.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed, with costs, order of Supreme Court, New York County, reinstated and certified question answered in the negative. Triable issues of fact exist concerning defendant-appellant's successor liability ( see Schumacher v. Richards Shear Co., 59 N.Y.2d 239, 245, 464 N.Y.S.2d 437, 451 N.E.2d 195 [1983] ).

Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and JONES concur.


Summaries of

Kaur v. Am. Transit Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of New York.
May 1, 2012
968 N.E.2d 994 (N.Y. 2012)

decreeing that triable issues of fact existed concerning the defendant's successor liability

Summary of this case from Lippens v. Winkler Int'l Corp.

decreeing that triable issues of fact existed concerning the defendant's successor liability

Summary of this case from Lippens v. Winkler Int'l Corp.

decreeing that triable issues of fact existed concerning the defendant's successor liability

Summary of this case from Lippens v. Winkler Int'l Corp.
Case details for

Kaur v. Am. Transit Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Sarbjeet KAUR, etc., Respondent, v. AMERICAN TRANSIT INSURANCE COMPANY, et…

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: May 1, 2012

Citations

968 N.E.2d 994 (N.Y. 2012)
968 N.E.2d 994
945 N.Y.S.2d 639
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 3362

Citing Cases

Scher v. CMJ Holdings Corp.

Plaintiffs argue that Holdings is liable for the debts of Network under the "mere continuation" and fraud…

Lippens v. Winkler Int'l Corp.

Under New York law, Bakery Engineering must at this stage continue to litigate its potential successor…