From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nzuh v. Wolf

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Apr 6, 2021
CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:20-CV-01691-P (W.D. La. Apr. 6, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:20-CV-01691-P

04-06-2021

AJONG LEONEL NZUH #A213 315 457, Plaintiff v. CHAD WOLF, Defendant


MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOSEPH H.L. PEREZ-MONTES

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein [ECF No. 8], and after a de novo review of the record, noting the absence of objection, having determined that the findings and recommendations are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [ECF No. 6] is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

THUS, DONE AND SIGNED in Chambers on this 6th day of April 2021.

/s/_________

DAVID C. JOSEPH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Nzuh v. Wolf

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Apr 6, 2021
CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:20-CV-01691-P (W.D. La. Apr. 6, 2021)
Case details for

Nzuh v. Wolf

Case Details

Full title:AJONG LEONEL NZUH #A213 315 457, Plaintiff v. CHAD WOLF, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Apr 6, 2021

Citations

CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:20-CV-01691-P (W.D. La. Apr. 6, 2021)