From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nyctl 2013-A Tr. v. Williamson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Sep 12, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 85443 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

M-2558 M-1855

09-12-2017

NYCTL 2013-A Trust and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Collateral Agent and Custodian, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Beverly E. Williamson, also known as Beverly Williamson-Rhode, also known as Beverly Williamson Rhoden, Defendant-Appellant, Hugh L. Williamson; New York City Environmental Control Board; The Ursuline School of New Rochelle; New York City Parking Violations Bureau; Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, Defendants.


Defendant-appellant pro se having moved for leave to prosecute, as a poor person, the appeal taken from an order of the Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on or about August 26, 2016, and for leave to have the appeal heard on the original record and upon a reproduced appellant's brief, to stay eviction and to consolidate the eviction orders with the appeal, and for related relief (M-1855), And defendant-appellant pro se having moved by separate motion for the same relief (M-2558), Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to said motions, and due deliberation having been had thereon, It is ordered that the motions (M-1855/M-2558) are denied in their entirety.

ENTERED: September 12, 2017

_____________________ CLERK

Present - Hon. Rosalyn H. Richter, Justice Presiding, Sallie Manzanet-Daniels Angela M. Mazzarelli Karla Moskowitz Troy K. Webber, Justices

Index No. 260477/14


Summaries of

Nyctl 2013-A Tr. v. Williamson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Sep 12, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 85443 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Nyctl 2013-A Tr. v. Williamson

Case Details

Full title:NYCTL 2013-A Trust and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Collateral Agent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Sep 12, 2017

Citations

2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 85443 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Citing Cases

Commonwealth ex Rel. Marshall v. Beeman

We concur in the finding of fact, and as well in the conclusion of law, that the supervisory power of a court…