From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

N.Y. Central Hudson River Rd. v. Village of Ossining

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 20, 1912
100 N.E. 1131 (N.Y. 1912)

Opinion

Argued December 4, 1912

Decided December 20, 1912

Frank L. Young, Glenn M. Congdon and T.G. Barnes for appellants.

John F. Brennan for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs. The error of the court below in the nomenclature of the alleged highway was immaterial; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., HAIGHT, VANN, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK, CHASE and COLLIN, JJ.


Summaries of

N.Y. Central Hudson River Rd. v. Village of Ossining

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 20, 1912
100 N.E. 1131 (N.Y. 1912)
Case details for

N.Y. Central Hudson River Rd. v. Village of Ossining

Case Details

Full title:THE NEW YORK CENTRAL AND HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, Respondent, v …

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 20, 1912

Citations

100 N.E. 1131 (N.Y. 1912)
100 N.E. 1131

Citing Cases

Young v. Scofero

No rights were thereby gained by the public and none lost by the plaintiffs. (Post v. Pearsall, 22 Wend. 425;…

Young v. Scofero

No rights were thereby gained by the public and none lost by the plaintiffs. ( Post v. Pearsall, 22 Wend.…