Opinion
2:20-cv-01503-JHC
06-12-2023
NXP USA, INC., and NXP B.V., Plaintiffs, v. IMPINJ, INC., Defendant.
ORDER
JOHN H. CHUN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(h)(3), the Court DIRECTS NXP to file a response to the motion for reconsideration (Dkt. # 527) no later than Wednesday, June 14th, 2023, at 12:00 p.m. NXP's response shall not exceed four pages. NXP's response shall be limited to the following questions: Is Kindler's “25%” figure on which Haas relies as a proxy for his “read sensitivity” calculation based on the testimony of Oliver? If so, why is Haas's methodology more reliable than Kindler's?
The parties should inform the Court if Kindler is anticipated to testify before this deadline.