From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nwozuzu v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 22, 2006
No. CIV S-05-1938 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-1938 MCE DAD P.

August 22, 2006


ORDER


By order filed on August 21, 2006, the district judge has adopted the findings and recommendations filed by the undersigned on July 11, 2006, and defendants' February 6, 2006 motion to dismiss has been granted in part. By this order, defendants will be granted twenty days to file and serve their answer to plaintiff's complaint. A discovery order will be issued concurrently with this order, and the protective order entered on July 11, 2006, will be terminated.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' answer to plaintiff's complaint shall be filed and served within twenty days after this order is filed;

2. The protective order entered on July 11, 2006, is terminated; and

3. Defendants shall serve their responses to plaintiff's pending discovery requests within forty-five days after this order is filed.


Summaries of

Nwozuzu v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 22, 2006
No. CIV S-05-1938 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2006)
Case details for

Nwozuzu v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:AMAESHI NWOZUZU, Plaintiff, v. DAVE L. RUNNELS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 22, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-05-1938 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2006)