From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nuttall v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Sep 30, 2022
No. 1702-22S (U.S.T.C. Sep. 30, 2022)

Opinion

1702-22S

09-30-2022

ARTHUR C. NUTTALL, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Kathleen Kerrigan Chief Judge

The notice of deficiency upon which this case is based was issued to Arthur C. Nuttall. The petition was filed on January 12, 2022, by Robert Pohl as counsel for petitioner. In the petition, he states that petitioner died on August 5, 2021, and Anne M. Nuttall is personal representative for petitioner's estate. On June 28, 2022, and June 29, 2022, the parties filed status reports, in which they state that Ms. Nuttal was not appointed personal representative for petitioner's estate and that no executor, personal representative, or administrator has been appointed for petitioner's estate.

It is well settled that unless the petition is filed by the taxpayer, or by someone lawfully authorized to act on his behalf, we are without jurisdiction. See Fehrs v. Commissioner, 65 T.C. 346, 348-349 (1975); Rule 60(a), Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. In pertinent part, Rule 60(c) provides that "The capacity of a fiduciary or other representative to litigate in the Court shall be determined in accordance with the law of the jurisdiction from which such person's authority is derived."

Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that, on or before October 24, 2022, petitioner and respondent each shall show cause, in writing, why the Court should not dismiss this case for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Nuttall v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Sep 30, 2022
No. 1702-22S (U.S.T.C. Sep. 30, 2022)
Case details for

Nuttall v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR C. NUTTALL, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Sep 30, 2022

Citations

No. 1702-22S (U.S.T.C. Sep. 30, 2022)