From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nutt v. Seta

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI
Mar 4, 2020
Case No. 1:19-cv-460 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 4, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 1:19-cv-460

03-04-2020

BRANDON NUTT, Plaintiff, v. P.O. CHRISTOPHER SETA, et al., Defendants.


ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 24)

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman (Doc. 24), to whom this case is referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

By: /s/_________

JUDGE MATTHEW W. McFARLAND


Summaries of

Nutt v. Seta

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI
Mar 4, 2020
Case No. 1:19-cv-460 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 4, 2020)
Case details for

Nutt v. Seta

Case Details

Full title:BRANDON NUTT, Plaintiff, v. P.O. CHRISTOPHER SETA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI

Date published: Mar 4, 2020

Citations

Case No. 1:19-cv-460 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 4, 2020)

Citing Cases

Pough v. DeWine

screen his tendered amended complaint under the PLRA regardless of whether the amendment is considered under…

McKinney v. Paddock

However, because Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se, the Court must re-screen his tendered amended…