From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nutall v. American Exp.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston
Dec 1, 2011
357 S.W.3d 809 (Tex. App. 2011)

Opinion

No. 14–10–01038–CV.

2011-12-1

Antonio NUTALL, Appellant, v. AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK, Appellee.

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 4, Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 957534, Roberta Anne Lloyd, Judge.Antonio Nutall, Houston, pro se. Christopher David Osborn, Taylor, for appellee.


On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 4, Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 957534, Roberta Anne Lloyd, Judge.Antonio Nutall, Houston, pro se. Christopher David Osborn, Taylor, for appellee.

Panel consists of Justices BROWN, BOYCE, and McCALLY.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is taken from a default summary judgment entered against Antonio Nutall and in favor of American Express Centurion Bank. In his sole issue, appellant claims the trial court erred in granting judgment because he was never served with appellee's motion for summary judgment.

Appellee concedes that it was not entitled to judgment because appellant did not receive proper notice of the Motion for Summary Judgment. See Tex.R. Civ. P. 21a. Appellee requests this matter be remanded to the trial court.

Accordingly, appellant's issue is sustained. The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Nutall v. American Exp.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston
Dec 1, 2011
357 S.W.3d 809 (Tex. App. 2011)
Case details for

Nutall v. American Exp.

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO NUTALL, Appellant v. AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston

Date published: Dec 1, 2011

Citations

357 S.W.3d 809 (Tex. App. 2011)