From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nunnally v. New Yorker Staatszeitung

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 16, 1906
78 N.E. 1107 (N.Y. 1906)

Opinion

Argued October 1, 1906

Decided October 16, 1906

William J. Amend, John E. Donnelly and Alfred J. Amend for appellant.

George H.D. Foster for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion of PATTERSON, J., below. Question certified answered in the affirmative.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., EDWARD T. BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT and CHASE, JJ.


Summaries of

Nunnally v. New Yorker Staatszeitung

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 16, 1906
78 N.E. 1107 (N.Y. 1906)
Case details for

Nunnally v. New Yorker Staatszeitung

Case Details

Full title:FLORENCE NUNNALLY, Respondent, v . NEW YORKER STAATSZEITUNG, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 16, 1906

Citations

78 N.E. 1107 (N.Y. 1906)
78 N.E. 1107

Citing Cases

Soper v. Associated Press

" We do not think that the facts in this case come within the rule of Fleischmann v. Bennett ( 87 N.Y. 231)…

Slobodin v. Sun Printing and Publishing Ass'n

CLARKE, J. (dissenting): I dissent on Nunnally v. New-Yorker Staats-Zeitung ( 111 App. Div. 482; affd. on…