From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nunez v. Goodman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 29, 1992
186 A.D.2d 521 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

October 29, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Eugene Nardelli, J.).


Defendants had moved for an order striking plaintiff's note of issue and certificate of readiness on the ground that the action was not ready for trial. The court signed a short-order form dated August 24, 1989 in which the decretal portion was left blank. Next to "Answering Affidavits — Exhibits" was a handwritten notation "Not Answered". More than a year later, defendants moved for an order of dismissal pursuant to CPLR 3404.

The court properly held that defendants could not rely on the August 24 order since it contained no judicial determination that the matter was stricken from the trial calendar (CPLR 2219). Since the case was not stricken from the trial calendar, there was no basis to invoke CPLR 3404.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Wallach and Ross, JJ.


Summaries of

Nunez v. Goodman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 29, 1992
186 A.D.2d 521 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Nunez v. Goodman

Case Details

Full title:GEORGINA NUNEZ, Individually and as Guardian of MARISSA NUNEZ, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 29, 1992

Citations

186 A.D.2d 521 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
589 N.Y.S.2d 330

Citing Cases

Vasquez v. Gomez

A dismissal pursuant to CPLR 3404 must be contrasted with a situation, like that herein, where the note of…

Marquez v. 171 Tenants Corp

While the work was not performed within their residences, it was undertaken for their benefit as…