From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nunez-Romero v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Mar 28, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16cv1196 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16cv1196 Crim. No. 6:11cr103(1)

03-28-2018

BONIFACIO NUNEZ-ROMERO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT

The Movant Bonifacio Nunez-Romero proceeding pro se, filed this motion to vacate or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. §2255 complaining of the validity of his conviction. This Court referred the matter to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and (3) and the Amended Order for the Adoption of Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to United States Magistrate Judges.

After review of the pleadings, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report recommending that Nunez-Romero's motion to vacate or correct sentence be denied. A copy of this Report was sent to Nunez-Romero's last known address, return receipt requested, but no objections have been received; accordingly, he is barred from de novo review by the District Judge of those findings, conclusions, and recommendations and, except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review of the unobjected-to factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the district court. Douglass v. United Services Automobile Association, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

The Court has examined the pleadings in this cause and the Report of the Magistrate Judge and has concluded that this Report is correct. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918, 109 S.Ct. 3243 (1989) (where no objections to a Magistrate Judge's Report are filed, the standard of review is "clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law.") It is accordingly

ORDERED that the Report of the Magistrate Judge (docket no. 9) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the District Court. It is further

ORDERED that the above-styled motion to vacate or correct sentence is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is further

ORDERED that the Movant Bonifacio Nunez-Romero is DENIED a certificate of appealability sua sponte. Finally, it is

ORDERED that any and all motions which may be pending in this civil action are hereby DENIED.

So Ordered and Signed

Mar 28, 2018

/s/_________

Ron Clark, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Nunez-Romero v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Mar 28, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16cv1196 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2018)
Case details for

Nunez-Romero v. United States

Case Details

Full title:BONIFACIO NUNEZ-ROMERO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Date published: Mar 28, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16cv1196 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2018)