From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nugent v. Lindsay

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 31, 1927
135 A. 919 (N.J. 1927)

Opinion

Submitted October 29, 1926 —

Decided January 31, 1927.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 4 N.J. Mis. R. 649.

For the appellant, James R. Nugent.

For the respondents, Herbert Boggs and John Francis Cahill.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Nugent v. Lindsay

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 31, 1927
135 A. 919 (N.J. 1927)
Case details for

Nugent v. Lindsay

Case Details

Full title:JAMES R. NUGENT, APPELLANT, v. STUART LINDSAY ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 31, 1927

Citations

135 A. 919 (N.J. 1927)
103 N.J.L. 500