Opinion
Submitted October 29, 1926 —
Decided January 31, 1927.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 4 N.J. Mis. R. 504.
For the appellant, James R. Nugent.
For the respondents, Herbert Boggs and John Francis Cahill.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.