From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nu-Enamel Nortown Distrib. v. Nu-Enamel Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jul 3, 1942
315 Ill. App. 494 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)

Opinion

Gen. No. 42,334. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed July 3, 1942

INJUNCTIONS, § 188showing to justify preliminary mandatory injunction without bond. Where plaintiff entered into a contract to become the exclusive distributor for defendant's products in a specified territory and alleged that the defendant abrogated the contract, the allegations of the verified complaint did not justify the issuance of a preliminary mandatory injunction without bond, which injunction order compelled defendant to manufacture its products and sell them to the plaintiff under the contract.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from interlocutory order of Circuit Court of Cook county; Hon. GEORGE F. RUSH, presiding.

Order reversed. Heard in third division, first district, this court.

Francis L. Boutell, for appellant;

A.D. McMahon, of counsel;

Blum Jacobson, for appellee;

George M. Shkoler, of counsel.


"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed July 3, 1942.


Summaries of

Nu-Enamel Nortown Distrib. v. Nu-Enamel Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jul 3, 1942
315 Ill. App. 494 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)
Case details for

Nu-Enamel Nortown Distrib. v. Nu-Enamel Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Nu-Enamel Nortown Distributors, Inc., Appellee, v. Nu-Enamel Corporation…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Jul 3, 1942

Citations

315 Ill. App. 494 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)
43 N.E.2d 205

Citing Cases

Kessler v. Continental Casualty Co.

The preliminary injunction here is akin to ordering CNA to specifically perform its contract with plaintiff…