From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

NTRE v. Middleton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jan 19, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-3338-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Jan. 19, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-3338-G (BH)

01-19-2018

NTRE, Plaintiff, v. ANTOINITA A. MIDDLETON, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned district judge is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and they are accepted as the findings and conclusions of the court. The removing defendant's application to proceed in district court without prepaying fees or costs (short form), filed December 8, 2017 (docket entry 4), is DENIED, and this removed case will be remanded by separate judgment.

SO ORDERED. January 19, 2018.

/s/ _________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

NTRE v. Middleton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jan 19, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-3338-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Jan. 19, 2018)
Case details for

NTRE v. Middleton

Case Details

Full title:NTRE, Plaintiff, v. ANTOINITA A. MIDDLETON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jan 19, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-3338-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Jan. 19, 2018)